A British local authority has lost its attempt to remove asylum seekers from a hotel in Essex after a High Court judge ruled that the government’s obligation to house migrants outweighed local planning breaches.
The case, brought by Epping Forest District Council, stemmed from tensions surrounding the Bell Hotel in the town of Epping, about 20 miles north of London. The council argued that the property’s owner was violating planning laws by using the site as temporary accommodation for asylum seekers without official approval.
The council sought an injunction from London’s High Court to stop the practice, but the Home Office opposed the move, saying that forcing asylum seekers out could undermine the government’s ability to meet its legal duty to provide accommodation.
Read Also: US ICE: Detain British Commentator Sami Hamdi, Revokes Visa
In a written ruling, Judge Tim Mould acknowledged that using the Bell Hotel for asylum seekers did indeed breach planning rules, but said this did not justify eviction.
“The current use of the Bell Hotel requires planning permission and is therefore in breach of planning control,” the judge wrote. “However, the continuing need to source contingency accommodation for asylum seekers from hotels carries significant weight.”
The Bell Hotel became a flashpoint for months of anti-immigration demonstrations following the arrest of an Ethiopian asylum seeker in July. The man was later convicted of sexually assaulting a teenage girl and a woman and sentenced to 12 months in prison.
The case sparked a wave of sometimes violent protests outside the hotel, resulting in several arrests and convictions for public disorder. The demonstrations reflected growing national tensions over immigration policy and the government’s use of hotels to house asylum seekers.
Britain’s asylum system has come under mounting pressure in recent years, with tens of thousands of people arriving across the English Channel in small boats.
The government has increasingly relied on hotels and other temporary facilities to house migrants awaiting decisions on their claims, a policy that has triggered widespread opposition from local councils and residents.
A Home Office spokesperson has repeatedly said the government is working to reduce the use of hotels by expanding alternative forms of accommodation, including large-scale reception centers and the controversial Rwanda deportation plan.
Meanwhile, Epping Forest District Council said it would continue to press for “proper planning procedures” and ensure that local safety and housing laws are upheld.
The Home Office did not immediately comment on whether it plans to appeal or relocate the asylum seekers currently housed at the Bell Hotel.
